What Is a Flat Income Tax System?
Details on the Flat Tax System
A "flat tax" is an income tax system in which everyone pays the same tax rate regardless of how much income they have. These systems are in place in eight U.S. states as of 2019, and several countries use this system as well, including Russia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
The U.S. federal government operates on a progressive tax system. The more you earn, the greater a percentage in taxes you'll pay. For example, single taxpayers pay a 10 percent tax rate on incomes up to $9,700 in 2019, but they pay 32 percent on income over $160,725 up to $204,100.
States With a Flat Tax Income System
Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee use the flat tax system as of 2019. Rates range from a low of 3 percent in Tennessee up to the highest rate of 5.10 percent in Massachusetts.
Some Federal Tax Rates Are Already Flat
Social Security and Medicare taxes are examples of a flat tax system already in place in the U.S. Employees pay 6.2 percent of their earnings in Social Security tax up on all earnings up to a wage base of $132,900 as of 2019. Earnings above $132,900 are exempt—the rate doesn't increase. They pay 1.45 percent of their earnings to Medicare, regardless of how much they earn.
Only Earned Income Is Taxed
Another aspect of this tax philosophy removes double taxation by taxing only earned income. Dividends, interest on savings, and capital gains that result from investment or increases in asset value are not taxed under a pure flat tax system. This is intended to encourage investment.
The Flat Tax Simplifies Taxation
Advocates of the flat tax system contend that it's fair because everyone pays the same tax rate. This system typically eliminates deductions, tax credits, and most exemptions, which in theory curbs biases toward certain behaviors and activities. It also simplifies the tax code, making compliance easier.
Economic Growth and the Flat Tax
Supporters of a flat tax system claim that it encourages economic growth by avoiding a system in which earners with higher incomes are penalized for being productive and earning more money. In fact, all countries that have adopted this system have experienced economic growth since doing so.
Proponents argue that a progressive tax creates penalties for things like hard work, risk-taking, and entrepreneurship. The flat tax is supposed to avoid this by taxing every dollar at the same rate.
Reducing the top income tax rate by moving to a lower flat tax rate is thought to attract and encourage business investment at the state level, and to bring in high-income individuals, increasing overall tax revenue and economic stability.
Arguments Against a Flat Tax System
Opponents argue that a flat tax system places an undue burden on the lower and middle class by removing deductions and expanding the tax base to include every level of income. They claim that moving to such a system shifts the tax burden from the rich to the poor, those who are most affected by taxation and who are the least able to pay.
They contend that the working class supports the idle rich when unearned income is exempted. Some flat tax systems in the U.S. get around this by exempting individuals who fall below certain income levels and by offering special exemptions or tax credits for low-income taxpayers.
Opponents of the flat tax argue that progressive tax systems are fair because they tax disposable earnings—income minus certain deductible expenses. They argue that the wealthy should pay more because they have more disposable income and therefore a greater ability to pay, and that the economy would be better stimulated by decreasing taxes on the middle class, who make up the largest part of the general public. This would give more people additional disposable income to spend on products.