The meaning of "catching a falling knife" is obvious, but the implications are not. This popular trader's phrase describes the attempt to make up the losses on an equity holding that has quickly lost a significant portion of its value. The trader tries to catch the knife by attempting to buy it at or near its low point. Then they hope to hold on as it rises again, hoping to make up their losses finally.
It's another version of the trading homily "Don't fight the tape." Ticker tapes are long gone, but the admonition lives on. A brief interpretation would be: "If the market is falling, don't assume you can know when to buy back in; if the market is rising, don't assume you know when to sell to catch the maximum in profits."
- This popular trader's phrase describes the attempt to make up losses on an equity holding that has quickly lost a significant portion of its value.
- Almost everyone tends to believe that they have some special insight that gives them an advantage over others.
- In critical situations that quickly unfold—one classic example is a rapidly falling market—we tend to rely on our intuitions.
A Historical Example of Knife-Catching
The research and news site DailyFX has developed a Speculative Sentiment Index (SSI). The index takes the number of forex traders who have open positions—both long and short—on various currency pairs. It shows the ratio of positioning on a given currency pair. The idea is that it helps the reader understand changes in investor sentiment by showing dynamic changes in buying and selling patterns.
In one instance, the price of the U.S and Canadian Dollar trading pair showed a vigorous and rapid increase. As the price continued to rise, the SSI showed that traders were increasingly betting against it and, as it happened, losing their bets. Finally, as the price continued rising traders capitulated and began going with the trend. At that point, the USD/CAD began a long fall. Throughout the currency pair's dramatic rise and again throughout its fall, traders tried to "catch a falling knife." In both instances, the knife cut them badly. Each trader's losing bet was predicated on the belief that the trader had some valid (and usually "special") insight into future market performance.
The Psychology Underlying These Axioms
Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman was intrigued by the knife-catching phenomenon. He, together with Wall Street Journal financial writer Jason Zweig, wrote a book about it—and many other related phenomena in the area of judgment and decision-making.
The book, "Thinking, Fast and Slow," is one that every trader should read. Kahneman and Zweig explore the thinking behind an investor or trader's belief that they can catch a falling knife and predict when the market will turn. They attribute it to a cluster of fundamental human traits.
First, almost everyone tends to believe that they have some special insight that gives them an advantage over others. Second, in critical situations that rapidly unfold—one classic example is a rapidly falling market we are heavily invested in—we tend to rely on our intuitions. It's a variation of the fight-or-flight response.
When we are losing money quickly, we go into a rapidly thinking mode and prepare to fight. We'd be better off, Kahneman points out, by slowing down and taking the time to analyze not only the market situation unfolding but also our response to it. What, for example, causes us to believe that we can somehow get back what we've lost by a single, drastic trading maneuver? What are the consequences, if that attempt fails?
Third, Kahneman examines more than 50 years of investor behavior and concludes that the market is fundamentally unpredictable and volatile, which we often don't notice. The entire retail finance industry is predicated on our willingness to believe that even if we don't have the kind of superior thinking needed to outperform the market, we can hire someone to do that.
As an annual S&P report points out year after year, most professional investment managers significantly underperform in the market. The vast majority of those who do outperform in a given year are unable to match that performance over time.