The Eurozone Crisis: Causes and Potential Solutions
What became known as the Eurozone Crisis began in 2009 when investors became concerned about growing levels of sovereign debt among several members of the European Union. As they began to assign a higher risk premium to the region, sovereign bond yields increased and put a strain on national budgets. Regulators noticed these trends and quickly set up a 750 billion euro rescue package, but the crisis persisted due in large part to political disagreements and the lack of a cohesive plan among member states to address the problem in a more sustainable way.
Timeline & Causes
The Eurozone Crisis began in late 2009 when Greece admitted that its debt had reached 300 billion euros, which represented approximately 113% of its gross domestic product (GDP). The realization came despite EU warnings to several countries about their excessive debt levels that were supposed to be capped at 60% of GDP. If the economy slowed, the countries could have a tough time paying back their debts with interest.
In early 2010, the EU noted several irregularities in Greece's accounting systems, which led to upward revisions of its budget deficits. Rating agencies promptly downgraded the country's debt, which led to similar concerns being voiced about other troubled countries in the eurozone, including Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Spain, which had similarly high levels of sovereign debt. If these countries had similar accounting issues, the problem could spread to the rest of the region.
The negative sentiment led investors to demand higher yields on sovereign bonds, which exacerbated the problem by making borrowing costs even higher. Higher yields also led to lower bond prices, which meant larger countries and many eurozone banks holding the sovereign bonds began to lose money. Regulatory requirements for these banks required them to write down these assets and then bolster their reserve ratios by saving more than lending—putting a strain on liquidity.
After a modest bailout by the International Monetary Fund, eurozone leaders agreed on a 750 billion euro rescue package and established the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) in May of 2010. Eventually, this fund was increased to about 1 trillion euros in February of 2012, while several other measures were implemented to stem the crisis.
Rescue measures were highly criticized and unpopular in nations like Germany that have larger and more successful economies.
Countries receiving EFSF bailout funds were required to undergo harsh austerity measures designed to bring their budget deficits and government debt levels under control by reducing spending. Ultimately, this led to popular protests throughout 2010, 2011, and 2012 that culminated in the election of anti-bailout socialist leaders in France and Greece.
The failure to resolve the Eurozone Crisis has been largely attributed to a lack of political consensus on the necessary measures. Rich countries like Germany have insisted on austerity measures designed to bring down debt levels, while the poorer countries facing the problems complain that austerity is only hindering economic growth prospects further. This eliminates any possibility of them "growing out" of the problem through economic improvement.
The so-called Eurobond was proposed as a radical solution—a security that would be jointly underwritten by all eurozone member states. These bonds would presumably have traded with a low yield and enabled countries to more efficiently finance their way out of trouble, and eliminated the need for additional expensive bailouts.
Some experts also believed that access to low-interest debt financing will eliminate the need for countries to undergo austerity and only push back an inevitable day of reckoning.