Mercantilism and Its Modern Significance
Is Mercantilism Back in Vogue?
Mercantilism is an economic theory that advocates government regulation of international trade to generate wealth and strengthen national power. Merchants and the government work together to reduce the trade deficit and create a surplus. Mercantilism—a form of economic nationalism—funds corporate, military, and national growth. It advocates trade policies that protect domestic industries.
In mercantilism, the government strengthens the private owners of the factors of production. These four factors of production are:
- Capital goods
- Natural resources
It establishes monopolies, grants tax-free status, and grants pensions to favored industries. It imposes tariffs on imports. It also prohibits the emigration of skilled labor, capital, and tools. It doesn't allow anything that could help foreign companies.
In return, businesses funnel the riches from foreign expansion back to their governments. Its taxes pay for increase national growth and political power.
Mercantilism was the dominant theory in Europe between 1500 and 1800. Countries all wanted to export more than they imported. In return, they received gold. It powered the evolution of nation-states out of the ashes of feudalism. Holland, France, Spain, and England competed on the economic and military fronts. These countries created skilled labor forces and armed forces.
Before that, people focused on their local town, kingdom, or even religion. Each municipality levied its tariff on any goods that passed through its borders. The nation-state began in 1658 with the Treaty of Westphalia. It ended the 30 Years War between the Holy Roman Empire and various German groups.
The advent of industrialization and capitalism set the stage for mercantilism. This phase strengthened the need for a self-governing nation to protect business rights. So, merchants supported national governments to help them beat foreign competitors. An example was The British East India Company who defeated the princes of India with 260,000 mercenaries. It then plundered their riches as the British government protected the company's interests. Many members of Parliament owned stock in the company. As a result, its victories lined their pockets.
Mercantilism depended upon colonialism as the government would use military power to conquer foreign lands. Businesses would exploit natural and human resources. The profits fueled further expansion, benefiting both the merchants and the nation.
Mercantilism also worked hand-in-hand with the gold standard. Countries paid each other in gold for exports. The nations with the most gold were the richest. They could hire mercenaries and explorers to expand their empires. They also funded wars against other nations who wanted to exploit them. As a result, all countries wanted a trade surplus rather than a deficit.
Mercantilism relied upon shipping. Control of the world's waterways was vital to national interests. Countries developed strong merchant marines and imposed high port taxes on foreign ships. England required all trade to be carried out in its vessels.
The End of Mercantilism
Democracy and free trade destroyed mercantilism in the late 1700s. American and French revolutions formalized large nations ruled by democracy. They endorsed capitalism.
Adam Smith ended mercantilism with his 1776 publication of "The Wealth of Nations." He argued that foreign trade strengthens the economies of both countries. Each country specializes in what it produces best, giving it a comparative advantage. He also explained that a government that put business ahead of its people would not last. Smith's laissez-faire capitalism coincided with the rise of democracy in the United States and Europe.
In 1791, mercantilism was breaking down, but free trade hadn't yet developed. Most countries still regulated free trade to enhance domestic growth. U.S. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton was a proponent of mercantilism. He advocated government subsidies to protect infant industries necessary to the national interest. The industries needed government support until they were strong enough to defend themselves. Hamilton also proposed tariffs to reduce competition in those areas.
Fascism and totalitarianism adopted mercantilism in the 1930s and 1940s. After the stock market crash of 1929, countries used protectionism to save jobs. They reacted to the Great Depression with tariffs. The 1930 Smoot-Hawley Act raised tariff rates up to 60% on 900 imports. When other countries retaliated, global trade fell 65 percent, prolonging the depression.
The Rise of Neomercantilism
World War II's devastation scared Allied nations into desiring global cooperation. They created the World Bank, the United Nations, and the World Trade Organization. They saw mercantilism as dangerous and globalization as its salvation.
But other nations didn't agree. The Soviet Union and China continued to promote a form of mercantilism. The main difference was that most of their businesses were state-owned. Over time, they sold many state-owned companies to private owners. This shift made those countries even more mercantilist.
Neomercantilism fits in well with their communist governments. They relied on a centrally-planned command economy. It allowed them to regulate foreign trade. They also controlled their balance of payments and foreign reserves. Their leaders selected which industries to promote. They engaged in currency wars to give their exports lower pricing power. For example, China bought U.S. Treasurys to fuel its trade with the United States. As a result, China became the largest foreign owner of U.S. debt.
China and Russia planned for rapid economic growth. With enough financial strength, they would increase their political power on the world stage.
Mercantilism laid the foundation for today's nationalism and protectionism. Nations felt they lost power as a result of globalism and the interdependence of free trade.
The Great Recession aggravated a tendency toward mercantilism in capitalist countries. For example, in 2014, India elected Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi. In 2016, the United States chose populist Donald Trump for the presidency. Trump's policies follow a form of neo-mercantilism.
Trump advocates expansionary fiscal policies, such as tax cuts, to help businesses. He argues for bilateral trade agreements that are between the two countries. If he could, he'd enforce unilateral agreements. They allow a stronger nation to force a weaker nation to adopt trade policies that favor it. Trump agrees that multilateral agreements benefit corporations at the expense of individual countries. These are all signs of economic nationalism and mercantilism.
Mercantilism opposes immigration because it takes jobs away from domestic workers. Trump's immigration policies followed mercantilism. For example, he promised to build a wall on the border with Mexico.
In 2018, mercantilist policies in the United States and China launched a trade war. Both sides threatened to increase tariffs on each other's imports. Trump called for China to open its domestic market to U.S. companies. In return, China requires them to transfer their technology to Chinese companies.
Trump also wants an end to some Chinese subsidies. China is assisting 10 industries prioritized in its "Made in China 2025" plan. These include robotics, aerospace, and software. China also plans to be the world's primary artificial intelligence center by 2030.
China is doing this as part of its economic reform. It wants to shift from a total command economy that relied on exports. It realizes it needs a domestic-driven mixed economy. But it has no plans to abandon its adoption of mercantilism.
The Library of Economics and Liberty. "Mercantilism." Accessed April 20, 2020.
University of Minnesota Libraries. "Principles of Economics: 2.1 Factors of Production." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Harvard University. "The Modern Capitalist World Economy: A Historical Overview," Page 19. Accessed April 20, 2020.
Saylor Academy. "2.1 What Is International Trade Theory?." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Karen Armstrong. "The Case for God." Knopf Canada, 2009.
New Statesman. "East India Company: The Original Corporate Raiders." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Digital History. "Chapter 4 British Mercantilism and the Cost of Empire," Page 14. Accessed April 20, 2020.
Robinhood. "What is Mercantilism?" Accessed April 20, 2020.
Wilson Center. "Chapter 3: Trade Agreements and Economic Theory." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Mises Institute. "Economic Nationalism: From Mercantilism to World War II." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Brown Brothers Harriman. "The Cycles of U.S. Trade Policy," Page 3. Accessed April 20, 2020.
World Trade Organization. "Trade in War’s Darkest Hour." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Margherita Zanasi. "Saving the Nation: Economic Modernity in Republican China," Page 237. University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Congressional Research Service. "China’s Holdings of U.S. Securities: Implications for the U.S. Economy," Pages 1-2. Accessed April 20, 2020.
Stanford University. "A Friendly Neighborhood Hindu: Tempering Populist Rhetoric for the Online Brand of Narendra Modi," Page 1. Accessed April 20, 2020.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "Trump’s National Security Strategy: A New Brand of Mercantilism?" Accessed April 20, 2020.
Economic Policy Institute. "What Should We Know About the Next Recession?" Accessed April 20, 2020.
University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School. "Bilateral or Multilateral: Which Trade Partnerships Work Best?" Accessed April 20, 2020.
The White House. "Remarks by President Trump During Visit to the Border Wall - San Diego, CA." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Office of the United States Trade Representative. "President Trump Announces Strong Actions to Address China’s Unfair Trade." Accessed April 20, 2020.
U.S. - China Economic and Security Review Commission. "Section 2: Tools To Address U.S.-China Economic Challenges," Page 74. Accessed April 20, 2020.
The State Council, The People's Republic of China. "‘Made in China 2025’ Plan Issued." Accessed April 20, 2020.
Scientific American. "Will China Overtake the U.S. in Artificial Intelligence Research?" Accessed April 20, 2020.