A Unique Approach to Budgeting

Increasing Income vs Decreasing Expenses


There are two ways to approach your budget. The most popular method is to examine your income, then cull your spending until it aligns with your income. A less common, but equally valid, approach is to decide how much money you want to spend each month, then force your income to match your expenses. Let's look at the pros and cons of both of these approaches.

Income-Expense Approach

Much has been written about the 50/30/20 budgeting method, which was proposed by Harvard economist Elizabeth Warren and her daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi. It says that people should devote 50% of their income to needs, 30% to wants, and 20% to savings and debt reduction. This budgeting method starts by looking at your income and basing your spending choices from that baseline. The main advantage is that it ensures that you live within your means, but on the other end, it can feel like a chore. Focusing on cutting costs rather than increasing income can seem more like deprivation. This approach may be best for people who have a stable, steady income.

Expense-Income Approach

With this technique, you want to first make a list of all the expenses you'd like to pay, and then figure out what type of income you need to aim for. For example, let's assume that you want to spend the following monthly:

  • Mortgage (including insurance and taxes): $2,000
  • Groceries: $400
  • Cellular Phone: $100
  • Household Good: $100
  • Car and Life Insurance: $100
  • Utilities: $200
  • Entertainment: $800
  • Car Payment to Yourself: $300
  • Retirement Savings: $1,000
  • Savings for Vacations and Holidays: $250
  • Saving for Home and Car Repairs and Emergency Fund: $250

Total: $5,500 per month

Now, let's assume that you currently earn only $4,000 per month. The objective then becomes to earn an extra $1,500 per month, which is, of course, easier said than done. Perhaps you'll decide to earn extra money on the side. For example, freelancing 50 hours per month (roughly 14.3 hours per week, or two hours a day) at $30 per hr will bring you an extra $1,500.

Perhaps you'll start looking for investments that can bring you part of that money. You might, for example, decide to buy a rental property that produces $200 per month in net positive cash flow (the money left over after paying for all expenses), or maybe you'll even decide to start looking for a new job with a higher salary.

The bottom line is that by using the expense-income approach (rather than the income-expense approach), your attention shifts away from trimming your bills and towards generating more money. That's a powerful mental shift.

Be sure not to use this approach as an excuse to start living above your means. If you earn $4,000 and you hope to live like you make $5,500, you have a great goal. But you should cull your spending until you reach that $5,500 mark.​ You also want to avoid lifestyle hyper-inflation and spend with every pay raise. Both your spending and your savings should increase proportionately with each pay increase.

The main advantage of this approach is it shifts your attention to making money rather than cutting costs. You begin with a list of the things that you want to do, and then you figure out a way to make that happen; it's empowering and opportunity-centered. The main drawback is the temptation to live above your means with this increased income and forget your savings goals. This method is probably best for people who have or want to have multiple streams of income.

The Bottom Line

Just because it's the most common way doesn't necessarily mean it's the best way. I've spent years discussing budgeting and money management with people across the nation, and I firmly believe that there is no single best method. Personal finance is personal, and you need to choose a method that suits your personality and style. The method you choose is less important than the result you achieve.