Global Warming Solutions, Their Types, and Benefits

Things You Can Do Today

Friends eating fruit are helping to solve climate change.
•••

 Photo by westend61/Getty Images

Global warming solutions reduce the impact of rising atmospheric and oceanic temperatures. Although 71 percent of Americans believe global warming is real, they don't know the best solutions. 

Why are solutions needed? The warmest 30-year period in the Northern Hemisphere over the last 1,400 years was between 1983 and 2012. Global warming cost the U.S. government more than $350 billion between 2007 and 2017.

It will cost $112 billion per year in the future, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office

Some people feel overwhelmed by climate change and think “Why bother?" Journalist Michael Pollen responds, "Why bother means game over. I actually see it as game on. It's a different point of view. Climate change is feedback, and any system that doesn't incorporate that feedback is stupid and fails and dies. Here, we have feedback, and the feedback it's giving us is a pathway to a much better world than the one we live in now."

Solutions to climate change create a cleaner, healthier world with more jobs, food, and life on the planet. Meeting the challenge will create a breakthrough in human thinking. But it means we must shift our way of seeing ourselves in relation to each other and the planet.

There are three types of solutions. They are coping strategies, solutions to reduce future greenhouse emissions, and methods of removing existing greenhouse gases.

Fortunately, the most powerful solutions are also ones that anyone can start today.

Coping Solutions

Many cities are already implementing coping strategies. They must address the impact of heat waves, flooding, and rising sea levels caused by global warming. 

The City of New York has painted more than 6.7 million roofs with a white reflective coating to cool its buildings.

 Researchers say white roofs reduce temperatures by 2.6 degrees Fahrenheit. But they could also reduce rainfall or lead to the need for more heating in the winter.

Los Angeles is painting its streets with a light gray CoolSeal paint. It will reduce LA's temperature by 3 degrees by 2038. 

Colombia is working to develop coffee plants resistant to fungus and pests. Global warming is disrupting the growing cycle, weakening the plants and leaving them more open to pests.

China is combating increased flooding with 30 new "sponge cities." In 2015, it launched the Sponge City Initiative. The government funded $12 billion to create water reuse projects. By 2020, it wants to have 80 percent of China's cities reusing almost three-quarters of their rainwater. The project will mitigate both flood damage and drought at the same time.

The City of Miami Beach, Florida, launched a five-year public works program to combat rising sea levels. The streets flood during high tide. The $500 million program will raise roads, install pumps, and redo sewer connections.

But these adaptive solutions won't work for long. New research reveals that climate change will create "hothouse Earth" in 20 years if we don't make dramatic changes in the next 10 years..

 

Reduce Future Greenhouse Emissions

In the Paris Climate Accord, nations promised to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. To do so, total emissions must be less than one trillion tons of carbon. Two-thirds of that allotment has already been released into the atmosphere. If nothing is done, the last third will be emitted in 20 or 30 years.

Countries argue over who should be allowed to emit it. Even more challenging is what happens once it's used up. The world must transition to zero emissions.

Accord members had wanted to limit warming to 1.5 degrees above preindustrial levels. That would be a challenge, because the temperature has already risen 1.2 degrees. In November 2018, the United National Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the world must reduce emissions within the next 10 years to make the target.

The Accord recommended its members do these three things:

  1. Eliminate coal as a fuel for electric generation by 2050. 
  2. Use solar and wind power for 60-80 percent of generation.
  3. Capture the carbon dioxide emitted by biofuel plants and store it underground.

Governments should also impose Pigouvian taxes on greenhouse gas emitters. These carbon taxes should be high enough to reflect the true cost of petroleum products.

The Kigali accord will reduce global warming by almost 1 F but cost $903 billion by 2050. Ninety percent of refrigerant emissions happen at the end of their useful life. Effective disposal of those currently in circulation is essential. They can be purified for reuse or transformed into other chemicals that do not cause warming.

Refrigerant management has been the most impactful solution, according to The Drawdown Project. Hydrofluorocarbons have 1,000 to 9,000 times greater capacity to warm the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. In October 2016, more than 170 countries agreed to the Kigali Accord. They agreed to phase out HFCs in high-income countries in 2019 and all others in 2028. Propane and ammonium are available substitutes.

On April 13, 2018, the shipping industry agreed to lower emissions from ships. By 2050, emissions will be 50 percent of the 2008 level. The industry emits 800 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, or 2.3 percent of the world's total. To reach its goal, the industry must replace oil with biofuels or hydrogen. It will need more energy-efficient designs.

China, Egypt, Mexico, and India are planning to build supersized solar farms. The world’s largest solar farm will be completed in 2019. Egypt is spending $4 billion to build a farm with 5 million photovoltaic panels. The farm will be 10 times bigger than New York’s Central Park and generate1.8 gigawatts of electricity. It's three times bigger than the largest U.S. farm in California. Mexico is building what will be the largest solar farm in the Americas. China is planning a 2 gigawatt farm, and India has just approved a 5-gigawatt farm. 

Japan’s government wants manufacturers to stop building conventional cars by 2050. China, the world’s biggest car market, already has a goal of one in five vehicles running on batteries by 2025. If U.S. automakers don't switch to electric vehicles, it will hurt American competitiveness. 

Improved battery technology could eliminate gas-hungry combustion engines. In 2018, Sila Nanotechnologies created a silicon-based lithium battery. It holds 15 percent more energy than the best battery out there. BMW will use the battery in its electric vehicles by 2023.  Sila is working on a battery that achieves a 40 percent improvement.

The United States could do much more to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. In 2016, natural gas generated 34 percent of the 4.079 trillion kWh of total U.S. electricity production. Coal-fired plants came next, generating 30 percent. U.S. nuclear plants generated 19.7 percent, while preventing 573 million tons of CO2 emissions. Hydroelectricity contributed only 6.5 percent, while other alternative sources including wind power only added 8.4 percent. A 1 percent increase of global wind power could reduce 84.6 gigatons of carbon dioxide. 

A 2018 survey found that 70 percent of Americans want utilities to move to 100 percent renewable energy sources. Fifty-one percent would be willing to pay 30 percent more to get it. More than 80 U.S. cities, five counties, and two states have committed to 100 percent renewables. Six cities have already hit the target. There ares 144 companies across the globe that have committed to 100 percent renewables. They include Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, Nike, and GM.

A new report in Energy and Environmental Science shows how the United States could convert to an 80 percent solar and wind-based energy system. It would require a significant advancement in energy storage technologies or hundreds of billions of dollars invested in renewable energy infrastructure. The researchers looked at 36 years’ worth of hourly sun and wind data in the continental United States. It gave them a better understanding of the geophysical barriers faced by renewable systems in the country.

The biggest challenge is storing enough energy to supply power when the wind and the sun aren't available. The United States has a power demand of 450 gigawatts. The United States would need to build a network of energy storage facilities able to bank 12 hours of solar energy at a time. It would need to have a storage capacity of approximately 5.4 terrawatt-hours. It’s the same size as the Tesla Gigafactory, Elon Musk’s giant battery production facility in Nevada. It would cost over $1 trillion.

California mandated that all electricity be generated by carbon-free sources by 2045.  It required all new homes to have solar power by 2020. It will add $8,000 to $12,000 to the cost of a house but reduce electricity bills. California's rate structure favors renewable sources. It will add $40 a month to the mortgage payment but save $80 a month in electric bills. New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C., are also considering similar legislation. California is already the leader in installed solar capacity. It provides 15 percent of the state's electricity and employs 86,000 workers.

Many cities are encouraging builders to add cool or green roofs to their structures. Cool roofs are painted white to reflect sunlight. Green roofs have a lot of plants on them. They use less energy than standard buildings and absorb greenhouse gases.

Orlando, Florida, has set a goal of generating all of its energy from carbon-free sources by 2050. It is shifting from coal to solar and wind. It's testing algae pools to absorb both rainwater and carbon.

Family planning helps by reducing the number of people. The best way to do this is to educate girls through high school. Girls who drop out of school in fifth grade to marry have five or more children. Girls who complete high school have two children on average. 

Reduce CO2 Already in the Atmosphere

Lowering future emissions isn’t enough to stop global warming. CO2 levels have risen so fast that temperatures haven't caught up. To prevent further warming, existing CO2 levels must be lowered from current levels of 400 parts per million to the preindustrial maximum of 300 parts per million. In other words, humanity must remove 30 years’ worth of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Removing greenhouse gases requires geoengineering of the planet and atmosphere on a grand scale. Carbon sequestration captures and stores existing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The safest solution is to return it to the ground.

In 2018, only 30 million tons were removed using carbon sequestration. To meet the Paris Agreement goal, 100 new carbon sequestration plants must be built per year by 2040. The Oil and Gas Climate Initiative has identified potential underground storage areas. Between 70 and 90 percent of this is within oil and gas fields. 

There are six ways that are most often discussed. The first three are the only ones that sequester carbon safely. 

  1. Plant trees and other vegetation to halt deforestation. Worldwide, forests store 1 billion to 2 billion tons of carbon each year. It only partially offsets the 10 billion tons people emit. They also provide shade, cool the surrounding area, and absorb pollution, The downside is it is slow and takes a lot of land. Trees are also costly to maintain. Similarly, use farming techniques that put carbon back into the soils. Seattle encourages developers to add rooftop gardens or walls covered by vegetation to new building projects. California is planting trees to prevent flooding and to absorb CO2.
  2. Manage soil better in farms. For example, reduce tillage that releases carbon into the atmosphere. Using compost as a fertilizer also returns carbon into the ground. It also improves the soil.
  3. Filter the carbon out of the air using chemicals that bind with it. President Trump's fiscal year 2019 budget gives companies a $50 tax credit for every metric ton of carbon they capture and bury underground. But it's less than the cost of carbon capture, which is $60 to $70 a metric ton. The process requires machines that move enormous amounts of air, since carbon makes up 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. It works at power stations because carbon dioxide makes up 5-10 percent of their emissions. The Petra Nova station in Texas will be the world's largest coal power plan. It will capture 90 percent of its carbon dioxide. But the captured C02 will be pumped into depleted oil wells. It will recover 60 million barrels of oil, which will release new C02 when it's burned. The C02 gas must then be transported to storage facilities.  It costs $11 per metric ton of C02. Retired oil fields have the best conditions. Volcanic basalt is also a good medium. The ocean's floor is made of it. Trump's tax credit could spur research into emerging energy technologies. Startups are exploring how to use excess CO2 to produce alternative fuels and building materials.
  4. Dump safe nutrients into the ocean to grow more phytoplankton. These tiny plants capture carbon. But it is also pollution and could create dead zones.
  5. Capture carbon from burning biofuels. This could add carbon to the air once the cost of growing and harvesting the plants is taken into account.
  6. Crush carbon-absorbing rock, such as olivine. But it would be very expensive to crush enough rock to make a difference.

Some more radical solutions suggest using particulates to cool the Earth by blocking sunlight. For example, volcanoes send particulates into the stratosphere, where they remain for a year. When Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted in 1991, the Earth's temperature dropped by 0.4 to 0.6 C. But this strategy has major drawbacks. The particulates destroy ozone, which protects the earth from cancer-producing radiation. They wouldn't reduce the effects of CO2 on the ocean. For example, CO2 makes the ocean more acidic, which destroys coral reefs. The particulates would also block solar energy, needed to make solar cell technology work. 

One way is to allow more pollution into the atmosphere. Pollution also cools the Earth. Particles like soot reflect the sun's heat before it gets a chance to reach the earth. These particles also help to form clouds, which reflect the sun's rays back to earth. But experts aren't sure if this would really lower the earth's temperature. It would also block sunlight, reducing the ability of carbon-absorbing plants to grow.

Others want to put particulates into the troposphere to create clouds. That would reduce temperatures, but also change rain patterns. For example, it could create droughts in rainforests, furthering increasing CO2 emissions. These analyses are supported by the National Academies of Science and by Daniel Cziczo, Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Economic Benefits

If the Paris Climate Agreement goals are reached, the world will save $30 trillion. That figure represents lost productivity and agricultural output. It also includes rising health care costs, all effects of global warming.

Once nations and companies realize they will save money by reducing CO2, there will be more incentive to do so. Those benefits exist. A 2018 MIT study found that China alone could save $339 billion by implementing its Paris agreement pledge. The savings result from fewer deaths from air pollution. The health and productivity savings would be four times greater than the China's costs of meeting those goals.

Here Are at Seven Things You Can Do

If you want to support efforts to reduce global warming, there are seven simple but effective steps you can take.

First, become carbon neutral. The United Nations program Climate Neutral Now allows you to offset all the carbon you've emitted by purchasing credits. It helps you calculate your specific carbon emission or they will assign you an average. These credits have funded $250 billion in green initiatives throughout the world. You can select the specific project that interests you.

Second, reduce food waste. The Drawdown Coalition estimated that 26.2 gigatons of CO2 emissions would be avoided if food waste was reduced by 50 percent. Unused food creates methane as it decomposes in landfills. Forests would not have to be cut down for farmland, preventing 44.4 gigatons of additional emissions.

Third, cut fossil-fuel use. Where available, use more mass transit, biking, and electric vehicles. Or keep your car but maintain it. Keep the tires inflated, change the air filter, and drive under 60 miles per hour. These simple steps will reduce your emission of greenhouse gases. The Economist’s April 9, 2007 article, "Mean Machine," discusses great tips on how to drive on the “green side.”

Fourth, legally hold the government accountable. Each year, $2 trillion is invested in building new energy infrastructure. The International Energy Administration said that governments control 70 percent of that. In 2015, a group of Oregon teenagers sued the federal government for worsening global warming. They claimed that by doing so, the government violated their rights, and those of future generations, under the U.S. Constitution. The suit claims that the government promoted regulations that supported the proliferation of 25 percent of the world's carbon emissions. It asks the court to force the government to create a plan to change course. Similarly, the State of New York has sued ExxonMobil for financial fraud. It claims the oil company misled investors about the external costs associated with carbon. 

Fifth, vote for candidates who promise a solution to global warming. The Sunrise Movement is pressuring Democrats to adopt a Green New Deal. It outlines steps that will reduce U.S annual greenhouse emissions from 2016 by 16 percent. That's what's needed to achieve the Paris Agreement's  2025 reduction target. Emissions must fall 77 percent to reach the 2050 target.  Republican leaders don't believe in global warming. Sadly, President Trump's economic plan is removing many of the solutions already in place. There are 500 candidates who have vowed not to accept campaign contributions from the oil industry.

Sixth, if you're a shareholder, pressure corporations to disclose and act on their climate-related risks. For example, shareholders convinced Royal Dutch Shell to establish and publish emissions targets. Sell your stock holdings in fossil-fuel companies. The City of New York pension fund has already done so.

Seventh, enjoy a plant-based diet with less meat. Cows create methane, a greenhouse gas. Monoculture crops to feed the cows destroy forests. The Drawdown Coalition estimated those forests would have absorbed 39.3 gigatons of carbon dioxide. As a result, the beef-based Western diet contributes one-fifth of global emissions. If cattle were their own nation, they would be the world’s third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases. According to a 2016 study, emissions could be reduced by 70 percent with a vegan diet and 63 percent for a vegetarian diet that includes cheese, milk, and eggs. It would also reduce rising health care costs by $1 trillion. Similarly, organic food uses less fossil-fuel based pesticides.

Last but not least, become more informed. Here are some good sources of news and solutions: