FY 2010 U.S. Federal Budget and Spending

FY 2010 budget announcement
President Obama announces the FY 2010 budget in the Oval Office.. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Fiscal Year 2010 was the Obama Administration's first budget. It estimated revenue and spending from October 1, 2009, to September 30, 2010. 

Revenue

In FY 2010, the Federal government received $2.165 trillion in revenue. The budget estimated receipts of $2.6 trillion, but the recession took a bite out income and subsequent taxes. Income taxes contributed nearly half (45%), social security taxes added 34%, corporate taxes were 12%, and the remaining 9% was from excise taxes.

(Source for actual FY 2010 income and spending: OMB, FY 2012 Budget, Table S-4, FY 2010 Actual Spending)Table S-3)

Spending: Budgeted and Actual

Spending was budgeted at $3.8 trillion. Actual spending was less, at $3.456 trillion. Over half went toward the Mandatory budget, such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. These expenditures have been mandated by law, and require an act of Congress to change. Around 40% of spending, or $1.306 trillion, went toward the Discretionary budget, which the President and Congress negotiate each year.

Mandatory

The Mandatory Budget was $2 trillion, or 52.6% of the budget. The largest items were Social Security and Medicare payments to recipients, as follows:

  • Social Security - $715 billion
  • Medicare - $451 billion
  • Medicaid - $275 billion
  • All other mandatory programs - $590 billion. These programs include Food Stamps, Unemployment Compensation, Child Nutrition, Child Tax Credits, Supplemental Security for the Blind and Disabled, Student Loans, and Retirement/Disability programs for Civil Servants, the Coast Guard and the Military.

    Reducing the Mandatory budget was one reason President Obama fought so hard for healthcare reform

    For the first time, the mandatory budget included an outlay of $45 billion for the Economic Stimulus Act. That's because the act, also known as ARRA, had been approved by Congress in 2009, and was therefore now a mandated program.

    The outlay was for the TARP program, which was set up to bail out national and community banks that were saddled with subprime mortgages. However, the largest banks repaid the TARP loans because they didn't like the U.S. government owning their stock. Therefore, TARP added revenue to the budget of $110 billion. This money was used in later years to fund homeowner mortgage refinancing.

    Mandatory Spending is revealed in the FY 2012 budget. Since the Mandatory budget is really just an estimate of mandated spending, the OMB usually does a good job of estimating it. In fact, Mandatory spending was $1.954 billion. Here's the breakdown:

    • Social Security - $705 billion.
    • Medicare - $446 billion.
    • Medicaid - $273 billion.
    • Other mandatory programs - $644 billion. That's because so many people needed benefits, thanks to the recession. (Source: OMB, FY 2012 Budget, Table S-3 and S-11)

    What About TARP? - In FY 2009, the government spent $151 billion on TARP. In FY 2010, an additional $45 billion was budgeted to bail out mostly community banks who were in danger of failing under too many subprime mortgages.

    However, $110 billion was paid back by the large banks, actually adding revenue. That's because the banks did not want the government to be part owners. Some of the banks insisted they didn't need the funds.

    Many people are still angry that their tax dollars went toward bailing out banks. However, this short-term emergency solution avoided a deeper recession by convincing panicked banks that the government would not let them fail.

    How Mandatory Spending Affects the Economy - With over half the entire budget dedicated to mandatory programs, the Federal government was restricted in spending on programs to revive the economy, such as education, business loans and even infrastructure. In the long run, the high level of mandatory spending means rigid and unresponsive fiscal policy, as the government's hands are tied unless it continues to increase the U.S. debt. This is a relentless drag on economic growth.

    Discretionary

    The Discretionary Budget was $1.37 trillion. This was due to a budgeted 13% increase in non-Security spending to $695 billion. Spending for nearly all agencies was up across the board. The budget included $24 billion for jobs initiatives. This increase did not include the Economic Stimulus Bill funds, which had been moved to the Mandatory Budget.(Source: OMB, Fiscal Year 2010, Table S-4) 

    The Military Budget - The President's request was $533.7 billion for the DoD Base Budget. This was a 3.5% increase over the FY 2009 budget request of $515.4 billion. There was an additional request of $130 billion for the overseas contingency fund. This supported an increase of troops in Afghanistan, and a safe wind-down in Iraq. This was a 72% increase in the $75.5 billion supplemental request for FY 2009.(Source: OMB, Defense Department Budget, 2010; Mid-Session Review, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2009 Table S-2.)

    Actual Discretionary Spending -This information is from the OMB's FY 2012 budget, which shows how much was actually spent in FY 2010. Discretionary spending was just under budget, at $1.306 billion.  

    Military Spending - Actual military spending increased to $851.3 billion, if you include the following three categories. First, there's the Base Budget for the Department of Defense (DoD), which was $527.9 billion. It expanded pay for retired military personnel and for Veterans Disability Compensation. It allowed for improved care for wounded service members, especially those mental health needs. The Defense Department promised to review acquisitions and defense technology development to eliminate waste. It also focused on improving the facilities used by service personnel.

    Add to that all other defense-related departments, such as Homeland Security, the State Department and Veterans Affairs. These totaled $160.3 billion. Specifically they were:

    • Veterans Affairs - $53.1 billion.
    • State Department - $49.8 billion.
    • Homeland Security - $39.8 billion.
    • National Nuclear Security Administration - $9.9 billion.
    • FBI and cybersecurity - $7.749 billion.  (Source: OMB, FY 2012 Budget, Table S-3 and S-11)

    It also included $167.4 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations, which meant increased troops in Afghanistan and a slow wind-down of troops in Iraq.  The 9/11 attacks prompted President Bush to convince Congress to add supplemental funds for the War on Terror. This covered operations in Afghanistan, and later the war in Iraq. The Obama Administration stopped using the name War on Terror, but kept the contingency spending.

    Non-military spending was much smaller. Here's a breakdown of the largest agencies:

    • Health and Human Services - $84.4 billion.
    • Education - $64.3 billion.
    • Housing and Urban Development - $42.8 billion.
    • Justice - $27.6 billion.
    • Agriculture - $25.1 billion.
    • NASA - $18.7 billion.

    How Did the Discretionary Budget Affect the Economy? In FY 2009 and FY 2010, the stimulus package increased spending in transportation, housing and human services. Many of these government programs had originally been created as part of the New Deal to provide a safety net for those who had been demolished by the Great Depression of 1929. The 2010 budget was a return to Depression economics. The increase in spending was designed to restore the economy to a healthy 3.2% growth rate by 2011.

    ​Budget Deficit 

    The OMB original budget planned for a record $1.6 trillion deficit. However, it actually came in at $1.294 trillion. This was second only to the FY 2009 deficit of $1.4 trillion.

    The U.S. Federal government's deficit spending has been ongoing since 2002. It has led to an unsustainable Federal debt. Continued deficit spending puts downward pressure on the dollar's value, increasing the price of imports. It increases the expectation that this debt will be paid by future generations, acting as a tax. This puts downward pressure on economic growth.

    Compare to Other U.S. Federal Budgets

    Continue Reading...