Donald Trump on Immigration
Pros and Cons of Donald Trump's Immigration Policies
President Donald Trump's immigration policies follow economic nationalism. Trump's "America First" program seeks to protect American workers and industries. It's a departure from decades of a U.S. immigration policy that centered on family reunification, asylum, and safe harbor of refugees. Most of what he's done is through executive actions and existing laws, not through Congressionally-approved policies. He is working on legislation to send to Congress that would award immigration status based on skill and merit.
Trump's immigration policies center around eight areas:
- Restrict legal immigration.
- Complete the border wall with Mexico.
- Reduce the number of asylum seekers.
- Stop undocumented immigrants from receiving benefits.
- Deport immigrants who arrived in the United States as children. They are currently protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
- Restrict travel and visas from certain countries.
- Reduce the number of refugees.
- Review the H-1B visa program.
Restrict Legal Immigration
On August 12, 2019, the Trump administration set stricter standards for legal immigration applicants. Those who use or may need public benefits like Medicaid, food stamps, or housing aid may not receive their desired immigration status. This applies to applicants for green cards and nonimmigrant visas. As a result, it rewards those with high incomes and private health insurance. The rule takes effect in Feb. 24, 2020.
Trump's policies are scaring even legal immigrants from using health care and other services.
The administration has made it more difficult for applicants for work visas and some green cards by requiring face-to-face interviews.
The policies have reduced the number of immigrant visas issued. In 2019, there were 462,422 immigrant visas issued to applicants abroad. That's down from 2016, when 617,752 were issued. The biggest decline was in immediate relatives, which fell from 315,362 in 2016 to 186,584 in 2019.
Complete the Border Wall With Mexico
President Trump promised to complete a wall on the 1,954-mile-long U.S. border with Mexico. A wall between San Diego and Tijuana was authorized in 1996. The George W. Bush administration built 650 miles of walls, pedestrian fencing, and vehicle barriers under the Secure Fence Act of 2006. Between 2007 and 2015, around $2.4 billion was spent.
Trump promised to force Mexico to pay for the wall, but that didn't happen. In 2019, Trump declared a national emergency to allow defense funds to be diverted to the wall construction. He also devoted funds to replace or enhance segments of the existing wall. The total cost is estimated to be between $15 billion and $25 billion.
Democrats largely oppose the border wall, but Republicans are largely in favor. Residents of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas face the most consequences. Opponents say the wall will cut off pathways for endangered species like ocelots. Supporters say it's worth it.
Critics say the wall won't work, especially without added security forces. Others worry about the impact on the environment in their states.
The conservative Heritage Foundation says the money would be better spent on technology and agents to prevent illegal crossings. It suggests more enforcement to apprehend immigrants who overstay their visas.
The government uses the number of apprehensions as a way to track immigration levels. In Fiscal Year 2019, there were 859,501 such apprehensions. They're down since a record 1.67 million in 2000 because border security is better. Half of all current immigrants without documentation crossed the border with visas but stayed after they expired.
Reduce the Number of Asylum Seekers
The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act states that any foreigner who arrives in the United States, "whether or not at a designated port of arrival," may apply for asylum.
The Trump administration tried many tactics to reduce the number of asylum seekers. Most of them were shot down in court because they were in violation of the 1965 act. Trump tried to deport anyone who appeared at the border without documentation. He tried to restrict asylum applicants to use only designated ports of entry. His administration briefly separated immigrant children from their parents before ending the policy due to popular outcry. There are some reports that the separations continue.
Trump is using Mexico itself as a border wall. He's doing this by preventing Latin American immigrants from even reaching the U.S.-Mexico border. His administration helped create a Guatemalan border patrol and has enlisted the Mexican National Guard. It's also negotiated regional asylum agreements that require asylees from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador to apply to one of the other countries instead.
Trump ordered that asylum seekers be returned to Mexico while waiting for the outcome of their hearings. The Migrant Protection Protocols forces them to live in dangerous conditions, without access to an immigration lawyer. In the camps, they are subject to rape, torture, and kidnapping.
Trump faces an uphill battle in stopping immigration because conditions in some Latin American countries are so bad. The World Bank estimates that climate change could send 1.4 million people north by 2050. Drought, shifting rain patterns, and extreme weather destroys crops and leads to food insecurity.
The World Food Program found that almost half of Central American immigrants left because there wasn't enough food. A university study found that rural regions of Mexico sent more immigrants after droughts and fewer after periods of rainfall. A 10% decline in crop yields during droughts created a 2% increase in immigration.
A big reason for the uptick in asylum-seekers is an increase in drug-related violence in Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. The gangs are fueled by the illegal drug trade to the United States.
Stop Undocumented Immigrants from Receiving Welfare
On June 22, 2017, Trump asked Congress to prevent all immigrants from receiving welfare for the first five years in the country. The move would take away the authority of states who currently decide who is eligible for assistance programs. Trump would also enforce regulations that deny immigration status to those who seem likely to become "public charges" within the first five years of their arrival.
The Department of Homeland Security found that use of welfare among undocumented immigrants was negligible, less than 1%. It reported that 15.5% of undocumented immigrants benefit from Medicaid. Around $2 billion a year goes to hospitals who must care for anyone who shows up at the emergency room. The percentage is similar to the 16.1% of native-born Americans who use Medicaid.
The study found that 9.1% of undocumented immigrants used food stamps, compared to 11.6% of native-born. Many undocumented immigrants receive benefits because they live in households with eligible Americans.
On January 9, 2018, the U.S. District Court in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. The policy protects "dreamers" from deportation. These are immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children. The judgment overrode Trump's announcement that he would end DACA on March 5, 2018. There are still pending legal actions against DACA. Trump wants Congress to create a replacement program.
On January 26, 2018, Trump released a proposed immigration plan. It would offer a 12-year path to citizenship for 1.8 million immigrants who arrived in the United States illegally as children. It would replace President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
On April 24, 2018, the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Department of Homeland Security must better explain its reasons for canceling DACA. If it doesn't do so in 90 days, the department must resume processing DACA applications.
On August 4, 2018, a federal judge ruled the Trump administration must fully restore DACA. On November 8, 2018, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld DACA.
On January 19, 2019, Trump offered to protect the Dreamers for three years in exchange for border wall funding. Democrats rejected it because it's not permanent.
DACA offers a two-year deferral of deportation for eligible immigrants. Eligible people are those under 31 who were illegally brought to the United States as children. President Obama launched the program with an executive order in 2012. Since its launch, 2,261,485 dreamers have applied for and received work permits.
The Cato Institute estimated that the elimination of DACA could cost the economy $215 billion over 10 years. That's the amount of lost spending power from these employed young people.
On January 27, 2017, Trump issued an order banning travel from seven majority-Muslim countries. It also barred entrance to Syrian refugees. This order was blocked in federal courts. In March 2017, Trump released a revised order, which was also struck down, though the Supreme Court allowed it to go into partial effect.
On September 24, 2017, Trump issued a third version of the travel ban, enacting restrictions on travel from eight countries.
- Chad: Bans immigrant, business, and tourist visas.
- Iran: Bans immigrant, business, and tourist visas. Allows student and exchange visitor visas.
- Libya: Bans immigrant, business, and tourist visas.
- North Korea: Bans immigrant and tourist visas.
- Somalia: Bans immigrant visas except for those with family or an infant needing medical care.
- Syria: Bans immigrant, business, and tourist visas.
- Venezuela: Bans business and tourist visas to government employees and their families.
- Yemen: Bans immigrant, business, and tourist visas.
The variations depended on how well the countries adhered to recommended security measures.
On Oct.r 17 and 18, 2017, federal courts halted portions of President Trump's travel bans. The judges said that the bans on predominantly-Muslim countries are unconstitutional. They interpreted Trump's own words to infer that his bans on Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen were based on religion.
On Dec. 4, 2017, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to implement its travel ban while litigation continued. In a 5-4 ruling released on June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the legality of this ban.
On Jan. 31, 2019, Trump banned applications for immigration to six more countries: Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania. People from these countries are still allowed to get tourist visas.
Reduce the Number of Refugees
In 1951, the United States signed a United Nations treaty that agrees "refugees should not be penalized for their illegal entry" because extreme situations sometimes "require refugees to breach immigration rules."
On March 6, 2017, a Trump executive order banned refugees for 120 days unless they were already scheduled for travel. Homeland Security has reviewed the application process to prevent any exploitation by terrorists. Trump planned to halve the total number of refugees accepted to 50,000 per year. Federal judges stayed those orders. That gave the State Department the ability to increase the number of refugees to 70,000 in 2017.
On October 24, 2017, the Trump administration allowed refugees from all but 11 countries. For the next 90 days, refugees from those countries had to show their arrival would be in the U.S. "national interest." The 11 countries included Iraq, Iran, Somalia, Syria, and Sudan. One official said they account for 63% of refugees.
According to the Pew Research Center, 53,716 refugees were resettled in the United States during fiscal year 2017. A breakdown in the bar chart below shows that refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo were the biggest group, accounting for 17%. They were followed by refugees from Iraq (13%), Syria (12%), and Somalia (11%).
In 2018, the Trump administration cut the staff that conducts clearance interviews overseas and intensified the screening process for refugees. It also doubled the number of people it characterizes as high-risk, increasing their screening process. As a result, it's estimated that only 22,491 refugees were resettled in 2018. That's the lowest figure since the resettlement program was created with the passage of the Refugee Act in 1980.
The steepest decline is with Muslims. In fiscal 2016, 38,900 Muslim refugees came to the United States, according to the State Department. In 2017, that number fell to 22,861. Only 3,495 entered in 2018.
Review the H-1B Visa Program
On April 18, 2017, Trump signed an executive order asking the Department of Homeland Security to review the H-1B visa program. He wants to make sure that only highly-paid skilled immigrants receive the visas. He doesn't want any to go to foreign workers that are paid less than their U.S. counterparts. That's ironic, since his Mar-a-Lago club sought H-1B visas for its cooks and waiters. It could take years for the review to be carried out.
The order is directed at foreign firms that operate in the United States but bring employees from abroad. Major tech companies are also big users of the H-1B visa.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service is sending many H-1B visa applications back for "further evidence.” At least 25% of such applications are being rejected compared to 20% a year ago.
Silicon Valley CEOs worry that Trump might restrict this program. The Immigration Act of 1990 provides temporary visas to 315,000 foreign skilled workers. Two-thirds were for computer-related jobs. These companies would lose valuable employees without the H-1B visa program. That would hurt the success of some of America's most profitable companies.
Other Trump Immigration Policies
In his 2017 State of the Union address, Trump established the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement. It helps victims of crimes committed by removable criminal aliens.
On October 8, 2017, the Trump Administration released a list of immigration requests to Congress. The wish list requested $25 billion in funding for a wall on the border with Mexico. He wanted Congress to create a bill that would treat unaccompanied minors from Central America the same as those from Mexico. Currently, they receive greater protection. Trump asked Congress to withhold federal funds from "sanctuary" cities. Those municipalities don't cooperate with federal immigration agents.
On November 1, 2017, Trump said he would eliminate the diversity lottery for foreigners seeking U.S. visas. He also asked the State Department to intensify extreme vetting of immigrants. He was responding to the terrorist attack that killed eight people in New York. The attacker had won his visa through the lottery.
The issues relating to immigration remain a hotly-debated topic. Many argue whether the contributions immigrants make to the U.S. society outweigh the drawbacks. The following list of pros and cons presents some of the issues that affect native-born Americans. Some of them support Trump's policies, while others aren't so clear cut.
Pros and Cons
The Center for American Progress estimated that mass deportation would reduce U.S. gross domestic product by 1.4%. This liberal research group estimates that farmers would have a hard time finding replacement workers. Instead, they would be forced to cut their production to fit the reduced labor supply.
The Cato Institute reported that it would cost $60 billion to deport the 750,000 people protected by DACA. They contribute $28 billion a year to the economy.
Immigration more than pays for itself. Immigrants add $1.6 trillion to the economy each year. Of that, $35 billion is a net benefit to the companies and communities where they live. The rest (97.8%) of that growth returns to the immigrant workers as wages. They repatriate $25 billion back to family members in Mexico. They spend the rest in America.
Native-born workers who compete directly with the immigrants for jobs are hurt the worst. Those are the young, less-educated, and minority workers. Their unemployment rate is higher than for older, college-educated, and white workers.
Illegal immigration lowers wages by 3% to 8% for low-skilled occupations. That averages out to $25 a week for native-born workers without high school diplomas. President Trump promised during his campaign to require companies to offer all jobs to Americans first.
Between 2000 and 2013, the number of native-born workers fell by 1.3 million. Studies show that they left the workforce. Many older workers retired or went on disability. Younger workers went back to school. During that same period, the number of working immigrants rose by 5.3 million. That's out of 16 million immigrants who arrived in America.
According to the Cato Institute, immigrants cost the U.S. government between $11.4 billion and $20.2 billion each year. They use that much more in services than they pay in taxes. On the other hand, they cost the government less than native-born Americans with similar education and work histories.
Immigrants in the workforce pay taxes into Social Security and Medicare. It improves the age dependency ratio, or the number of working people who support the nation's senior population. The ratio is worsening because the native-born population is aging. There aren't as many in the working-age population to support them. As more immigrants enter the workforce, the age dependency ratio improves.
Immigrant women are also more likely to have children. In 2016, 7.4% of foreign-born women gave birth. Only 5.9% of American-born women did. The higher birth rate of immigrants helps support the current working population when they retire.
If the government granted them amnesty, the costs to society would increase significantly, a study by The Center for Immigration Studies found in 2004.
The Bottom Line
President Trump’s “America First” policy and national security concerns are bent on tightening the noose around both illegal and legal immigration. Whether the new policies are good or bad for the country is really up for debate.
What is clear though, is that U.S. immigration policies need comprehensive reforms. But you need to be aware of the extent of these reforms and how they are to be implemented. They are important international as well as domestic policies that could have overbearing effects on the health of the U.S. economy.
Pew Research Center. "How U.S. Immigration Laws and Rules Have Changed Through History," Accessed Feb. 17, 2020.
The New Yorker. "How the Trump Administration Uses the Hidden Weapons of Immigration Law," Interview with American Immigration Council. Accessed Feb. 17, 2020.
The White House. "The Trump Administration’s Immigration Agenda Protects American Workers, Taxpayers, and Sovereignty," Accessed Feb. 18, 2020.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. “Policy Memoranda,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “An American Budget, Fiscal Year 2019,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Migration Policy Insitute. "The Trump Immigration Plan: A Lopsided Proposal," Accessed Feb. 17, 2020.
Council on Foreign Relations. “How Does the U.S. Refugee System Work?” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. “H-1B Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Cap Season,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service. “Final Rule on Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility,” Accessed Feb. 21, 2020.
Migration Policy Institute. "Immigration-Related Policy Changes in the First Two Years of the Trump Administration," Download report. Page 33. Accessed Feb. 21, 2020.
U.S. Department of State. "Report of the Visa Office 2019," Accessed Feb. 21, 2020.
Whitehouse.gov. “Law and Justice,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Federation for American Immigration Reform. "The Current State of the Border Fence," Accessed Feb. 18, 2020.
Congress.gov. “H.R. 6061 – Secure Fence Act of 2006,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. “Southwest Border Security: Additional Actions Needed to Better Assess Fencing’s Contributions to Operations and Provide Guidance for Identifying Capability Gaps,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection. “Santa Teresa Border Wall Replacement Project to Begin,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection. “Border Wall Contract Award in Arizona,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Pew Research Center. “Most Border Wall Opponents, Supporters Say Shutdown Concessions are Unacceptable,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Heritage Foundation. “The Wall is Not Enough. Here’s How to Solve Illegal Immigration,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection. "CBP Enforcement Statistics Fiscal Year 2020," Accessed Feb. 18, 2020.
The Washington Post. “The History of U.S. Border Apprehensions,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Pew Research Center. “Modes of Entry for the Unauthorized Migrant Population,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
United States Code, Office of the Law Revision Counsel. “1158. Asylum,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The New York Times. “Trump Calls for Depriving Immigrants Who Illegally Cross Border of Due Process Rights,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Jurist. “Federal Judge Blocks Asylum Restrictions,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “Affording Congress an Opportunity to Address Family Separation,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Federal Register. "Implementing Bilateral and Multilateral Asylum Cooperative Agreements Under the Immigration and Nationality Act," Accessed Feb. 20, 2020.
The World Bank. “Groundswell. Policy Note #3. “Internal Climate Migration in Latin America,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Scientific American. “Trump’s Border Wall Highlights the Climate – Migration Connection,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Council on Foreign Relations. “Central America’s Turbulent Northern Triangle,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. "Cocaine from South America to the United States," Accessed Nov. 27, 2019.
Federal Register. “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
PBS News Hour. “How Undocumented Immigrants Sometimes Receive Medicaid Treatment,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Washington Post. “DACA Injunction Adds to Limbo for ‘Dreamers’ as Trump Crackdown, Hill Talks Continue,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Splinter. “What Exactly is Happening with DACA Today?” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
National Immigration Law Center. “Status of Current DACA Litigation,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Time. “President Trump Proposed Fixing DACA and Cutting Legal Immigration. Both Sides Hate the Plan,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Guardian. “What is DACA and Who are the Dreamers?” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The New York Times. “U.S. Must Keep DACA and Accept new Applications, Federal Judge Rules,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
People’s Pundit Daily. “Bush Judge Orders Trump Administration to Fully Restore DACA," Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
CNN Politics. “Appeals Court Says Administration Can’t End DACA, Trump Says It Sets Up Supreme Court Fight,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Washington Post. “Trump Offers 3-Year Extension of Protection for ‘Dreamers’ in Exchange for $5.7 Billion for Wall; Democrats Call It a ‘Non-Starter’,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Homeland Security. “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA),” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. "Number of Form I‐821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, by Fiscal Year, Quarter, Intake and Case Status Fiscal Year 2012‐2018 (September 30, 2018)," Accessed Dec. 16, 2019.
BuzzFeed News. “Scrapping DACA Could Cost the Economy As Much As $215 Billion,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Washington Post. “Second Judge Rules Against Latest Entry Ban, Saying Trump’s Own Words Show it was Aimed at Muslims,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Supreme Court of the United States. “Trump, President of the United States, et. Al., v. Hawaii Et Al,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The UN Refugee Agency. “Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
NPR. “Trump Signs New Order Blocking Arrivals From 6 Majority-Muslim Countries,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The New York Times. “U.S. Quietly Lifts Limit on Number of Refugees Allowed In,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Wall Street Journal. “U.S. to Resume Admitting Refugees but Those From 11 Countries to See More Scrutiny,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Pew Research Center. “Key Findings About U.S. Immigrants,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The New York Times. “Apartments are Stocked, Toys Donated. Only the Refugees are Missing,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Center for Immigration Studies. “Refugee Resettlement Admission in FY 2018,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Human Rights First. "U.S. Refugee Resettlement Remains at Record Lows Halfway into FY 2019," Accessed Dec. 16, 2019.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. “Buy American: Putting American Workers First,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The New York Times. “Trump Signs Order That Could Lead to Curbs on Foreign Workers,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Wall Street Journal. “Trump Administration Tightens Scrutiny of Skilled Worker Visa Applicants,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Verge. “Donald Trump’s Anti-Immigration Stance Threatens the Heart of American Innovation,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE),“ Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Whitehouse.gov. “President Donald J. Trump’s Letter to House and Senate Leaders & Immigration Principles and Policies,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Center for Immigration Studies. “The Fiscal and Economic Impact of Immigration on the United States,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Center for American Progress. “The Economic Impacts of Removing Unauthorized Immigrant Workers,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Business Insider. “Trump’s Immigration Plans Could Cripple the US Economy and Hurt the Workers He’s Pledging to Protect,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
The Washington Post. “Trump Reveals How He Would Force Mexico to Pay for Border Wall,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
University of Michigan. “The Immigration Debate, Economic Impact,” Dec. 5, 22019.
Center for Immigration Studies. “Immigrant Gains and Native Losses in the Job Market, 2000 to 2013,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
CATO Institute. “The Use of Public Assistance Benefits by Citizens and Non-citizen Immigrants in the United States,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Pew Research Center. “Fertility in the Past Year, by Nativity and Region of Birth: 2016,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.
Center for Immigration Studies. “The High Cost of Cheap Labor. Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Accessed Dec. 5, 2019.