Arbitration vs. Litigation - What is the Difference?

Arbitration vs. Litigation
Arbitration vs. Litigation. Kirby Hamilton/Getty Images

The Arbitration Process vs. the Litigation Process

You may have encountered an arbitration clause in a contract and wondered what it is and whether you should be happy or upset about this clause. Some contracts may contain a mandatory arbitration clause, which states that all disputes must be handled by arbitration.

Or a colleague may have suggested to you that you include an arbitration clause in a contract, and you are wondering why this would benefit you.

Arbitration as a process is very different from the process of litigation (trying cases in court), for business disputes. You are probably familiar with the litigation process, but you may not be familiar with arbitration. 

Differences Between Arbitration and Litigation 

Litigation is a very old process that involves determining issues through a court, with a judge or jury. In this case, we're talking about civil litigation - disputes between two parties (as opposed to criminal litigation, which involves breaking laws.

Arbitration, on the other hand, involves two parties in a dispute who agree to work with a disinterested third party in an attempt to resolve the dispute. 

Here are some differences between litigation and arbitration:

Public/Private, Formality
The arbitration process is private, between the two parties and informal, while litigation is a formal process conducted in a public courtroom.

Speed of Process
The arbitration process is fairly quick. Once an arbitrator is selected, the case can be heard immediately. In a civil litigation, on the other hand, a case must wait until the court has time to hear it; this can mean many months, even years, before the case is heard.

Cost of the Process
The costs for the arbitration process are limited to the fee of the arbitrator(depending on the size of the claim, expertise of the arbitrator, and expenses), and attorney fees.

Costs for litigation include attorney fees and court costs, which can be very high.

Selection of Arbitrator/Judge
The parties in the arbitration process decide jointly on the arbitrator; in a litigation, the judge is appointed and the parties have little or no say in the selection. The parties may have some say in whether a case is heard by a judge or a jury.

Use of Attorneys
Attorneys may represent the parties in an arbitration, but their role is limited; in civil litigation, attorneys spend much time gathering evidence, making motions, and presenting their cases; attorney costs in a litigation can be very high.

Evidence Allowed
The arbitration process has a limited evidence process, and the arbitrator controls what evidence is allowed, while litigation requires full disclosure of evidence to both parties. The rules of evidence do not apply in arbitration, so there are no subpoenas, no interrogatories, no discovery process.

Availability of Appeal
In binding arbitration, the parties usually have no appeal option, unless an appeal has been included in an arbitration clause.

Some arbitration decisions may be reviewed by a judge and may be vacated (removed), if you can prove that the arbitrator was biased. Litigation allows multiple appeals at various levels.

Arbitration vs. Litigation

 Private - between the two partiesPublic - in a courtroom
Type of ProceedingCivil - privateCivil and criminal
Evidence allowedLimited evidentiary processRules of evidence allowed
How arbitrator/judge selectedParties select arbitratorCourt appoints judge - parties have limited input
Appeal availableUsually binding; no appeal possibleAppeal possible
Use of attorneysAt discretion of parties; limitedExtensive use of attorneys
Waiting time for case to be heardAs soon as arbitrator selected; shortMust wait for case to be scheduled; long
CostsFee for arbitrator, attorneysCourt costs, attorney fees; costly

Continue Reading...