Difference Between Agency and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities

A color-wheel of houses

Dimitri Otis / Getty Images

Mortgage-backed securities (MBS), which are groups of home mortgages that are sold by the issuing banks and then packaged together into “pools” and sold as a single security, can be classified in two ways: “agency” or “non-agency” securities.

Definitions of Agency and Non-Agency MBS

Agency MBS are created by one of three agencies: Government National Mortgage Association (known as GNMA or Ginnie Mae), Federal National Mortgage (FNMA or Fannie Mae), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac). Securities issued by any of these three agencies are referred to as agency MBS.

GNMA bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and thus are free from default risk. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were both chartered by the U.S. government, but they're now shareholder-owned companies operating under a congressional charter. They lack the same backing as Ginnie Mae bonds, but the risk of default is still considered negligible.

Private entities, such as financial institutions, can also issue mortgage-backed securities. In this case, the MBS are referred to as non-agency MBS or private-label securities. These bonds are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any government-sponsored enterprise since they've often consisted of pools of borrowers who couldn’t meet agency standards.

Many of these non-agency loans were the “Alt-A” and “subprime” loans that gained notoriety during the 2008 financial crisis. This, in conjunction with the lack of government backing, means that non-agency MBS contains an element of credit risk (i.e., a possibility of default) not present in agency MBS.

A Brief History of Non-Agency MBS

The heaviest issuance of non-agency MBS occurred from 2001 through 2007 and then ended in 2008 following the mortgage crisis in the U.S. The rapid growth in the non-agency MBS market is widely cited as being a key catalyst for the crisis since these securities provided a way for less creditworthy homebuyers to gain financing. It eventually led to an increased in delinquencies, causing non-agency MBS to collapse in value in 2008. The “contagion” subsequently spread to higher-quality securities, accelerating the crisis and causing new issuance to come to a halt.

Money managers can still invest in non-agency MBS today despite the lack of new issuance, as the securities issued prior to the financial crisis continue to trade in the open market. The asset class has performed very well in the subsequent recovery, however, rewarding contrarian money managers who took the risk of buying into a very depressed market in 2009.

Leave the Analysis to the Pros

Except in the rarest of cases, non-agency MBS aren’t for individual investors. The asset management firm PIMCO outlines some considerations involved in selecting individual securities within this market segment:

  • Housing market analysis, on both the national and local levels
  • Public policy analysis
  • Analysis of the various individual segments, or tranches, within each MBS deal to determine those issues with the optimal risk/return profile
  • Market liquidity
  • Interest-rate and yield curve analysis
  • Analyzing the various servicing entities

Although it isn’t advisable for investors to purchase non-agency MBS on their own, many actively-managed bond funds own these securities. In many cases, the funds have owned these bonds since the post-crisis period, in which case they would have made a large contribution to returns. While there isn’t nearly as much upside in non-agency MBS now as there was five years ago, consider their presence in a bond fund as an indication the manager is willing to seek opportunities in unpopular market segments.